Pacifica Wallet Analyzer
Pacifica Leaderboard ↗

See what kind of trader
any Pacifica wallet really is.

Every exchange gives open access to the trading data of the wallets that use it — yet it's rarely obvious how a wallet actually trades, or how it truly made or lost its money. Positions are often opened and closed in many small pieces across thousands of trades, and it's easy for a newcomer to misread the raw numbers. We do that reading for you: we compile each wallet's trading behaviour into a clear style — so you can easily see how it earns or loses.

Check a wallet →
What you get
For any address we compute an honest P&L and return (adjusted for deposits and withdrawals), a month-by-month map of where the money was made or lost, the wallet's trading style (direction, maker/taker, assets, activity), and a short verdict that ties it together. Everything is derived from the public Pacifica API — nothing is invented.
The five wallet types we detect
Market maker

Quotes both sides and earns the spread. Its long/short tilt is leftover inventory, not a bet on the market.

Directional bot

Automated trading that takes a side. High frequency, driven by an algorithm we can't see inside — we describe its behaviour, not its code.

Manual trader

A human placing orders by hand — fewer, larger trades held for hours or days. Here we can also show hold time and win rate.

Volume farmer

Churns huge volume for points, not profit. Its returns shouldn't be read as trading skill — it's paying fees to farm.

Inactive / not a trader

Dormant, or never traded at all. Shown for context — we don't invent a strategy where there isn't one.

How we classify — and why it's a heuristic
We infer the type from public trade data using rules of thumb — for example, we treat more than ~8 orders per day as automated, and a maker share above 70% as market-making. These are our subjective thresholds, calibrated on real wallets. A real account can sit on the border, or behave in a way the data can't reveal. Treat every label as an informed guess, not a verdict of fact. When a metric isn't reliable for a given wallet, we don't show it rather than fake it. And if you disagree with how we classified a wallet — or have an idea to make it better — please leave feedback. We'd genuinely love to hear it and keep improving.